2016 School Accountability Report Card

2016-17 School Accountability Report Card for E.O. GREEN JUNIOR HIGH ... is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC...

0 downloads 0 Views 564KB Size

Recommend Documents


2016 School Accountability Report Card
The SARC contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. ... of time that a workstation may be used (depending on availability), the types of ... Black or African American .... cognitive disabilities); and .

2016 School Accountability Report Card
Aug 1, 2018 - By February 1 of each year, every school in California is required by state law ... Warner's Preschool, Elementary, Junior/High School and District Office is ... has purchased textbooks from the most recent state-approved lists.

2016 School Accountability Report Card
procedures and processes for fire drills, earthquakes, lock down drills and other dangers (i.e., bomb threats). Alila's Safety Plan is reviewed for accuracy by the ...

2016 School Accountability Report Card
2016-17 School Accountability Report Card for CHARLES F. BLACKSTOCK JUNIOR HIGH ... For more information about SARC requirements, see the California ...

2016 School Accountability Report Card
2016-17 School Accountability Report Card for Waterford Junior High School ... For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department ...

2016 School Accountability Report Card
2016-17 School Accountability Report Card for Lucille Whitehead ... software programs available on a workstation, and the ability to print documents. About This ...

2016 School Accountability Report Card
2016-17 School Accountability Report Card for Earlimart Community Day School ..... California Standards Tests (CSTs), California Modified Assessment (CMA), ...

2016 School Accountability Report Card
For more information about SARC requirements, see the California .... Student Council representatives have taken on the job of recycling waste materials and .... becoming actively involved in Parent Teacher Association (PTA), English ...

2016 School Accountability Report Card
Dec 22, 2017 - Butte County Special Education/Mesa Vista ... Special Education Teachers and Designated Instruction Specialists provide the following:.

2016 School Accountability Report Card
Aug 1, 2018 - students to the College Fair in San Diego each year and to visit nearby colleges and universities. ... has purchased textbooks from the most recent state-approved lists. ..... Standards for California Public Schools (CA NGSS).

E.O. GREEN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the 2016-17 School Year Published During 2017-18 By February 1 of each year, every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC). The SARC contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educational agencies (LEAs) are required to prepare a Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, with specific activities to address state and local priorities. Additionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent with data reported in the SARC. •

For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Education (CDE) SARC Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/.



For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/.



For additional information about the school, parents/guardians and community members should contact the school principal or the district office.

DataQuest DataQuest is an online data tool located on the CDE DataQuest Web page at http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/ that contains additional information about this school and comparisons of the school to the district and the county. Specifically, DataQuest is a dynamic system that provides reports for accountability (e.g., test data, enrollment, high school graduates, dropouts, course enrollments, staffing, and data regarding English learners). Internet Access Internet access is available at public libraries and other locations that are publicly accessible (e.g., the California State Library). Access to the Internet at libraries and public locations is generally provided on a first-come, first-served basis. Other use restrictions may include the hours of operation, the length of time that a workstation may be used (depending on availability), the types of software programs available on a workstation, and the ability to print documents.

About This School Contact Information (School Year 2017-18) School Contact Information School Name-------

E.O. GREEN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

Street-------

3739 South C Street

City, State, Zip-------

Oxnard, CA 93033

Phone Number------- (805) 986-8750 Principal-------

Heidi Haines

E-mail Address------- [email protected] Web Site-------

http://green.hueneme.org

CDS Code

56-72462-6055040

2016-17 School Accountability Report Card for E.O. GREEN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

Page 1 of 11

District Contact Information District Name-------

HUENEME ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT

Phone Number------- (805) 488-3588 Superintendent------ Dr. Christine Walker -E-mail Address------- [email protected] Web Site-------

www.hueneme.org

School Description and Mission Statement (School Year 2017-18) E.O. Green Junior High School was established in 1960 in the city of Oxnard, California. Approximately 1,315 grade 6 through 8 students are enrolled. Approximately 16.4% of those students are English language learners and approximately 94% participate in the free and reduced lunch program. E.O. Green’s mission is to create a student-centered learning environment that will promote lifelong learning, positive self-concepts, and collaborative relationships while preparing students for productive and successful citizenship in our society. Our school is dedicated to our motto, "Everyone at E.O. Green is treated with dignity and respect." We strive to provide a safe, supportive environment for students, staff and community members, and promote a positive partnership between home, school and community. Our excellent teaching and support staff is committed to providing a positive climate for learning in which all students can reach their full potential in academics, attitudes, athletics, and the arts. We strive to facilitate successful student transitions from the selfcontained classroom of our district’s elementary schools to our departmentalized instructional program. We incorporate technology into our teaching, and are always in pursuit of excellence in our implementation of the New California State Standards. Student achievement data is collected and analyzed to determine student successes and areas for instructional improvement. Academically at-risk students are identified early and provided with targeted, effective interventions. Our goal is to provide a school community in which every child is provided with the skills and tools needed to succeed in high school, and ultimately, for college and careerreadiness. Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2016-17) Grade Level

Number of Students

Grade 6

417

Grade 7

436

Grade 8

395

Total Enrollment

1,248

Student Enrollment by Group (School Year 2016-17) Student Group

Percent of Total Enrollment

Black or African American

1.6

American Indian or Alaska Native

0.1

Asian

1

Filipino

1.9

Hispanic or Latino

86.6

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

0.3

White

6.3

Two or More Races

2.2

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged

85.4

English Learners

20

Students with Disabilities

12.4

Foster Youth

0.5

2016-17 School Accountability Report Card for E.O. GREEN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

Page 2 of 11

A. Conditions of Learning State Priority: Basic The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Basic (Priority 1): • Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching; • Pupils have access to standards-aligned instructional materials; and • School facilities are maintained in good repair. Teacher Credentials School

Teachers

District

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

2017-18

With Full Credential

51

52

52

364

Without Full Credential

0

0

0

0

Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence (with full credential)

4

4

4

8

Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions Indicator

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners

0

0

0

Total Teacher Misassignments *

0

0

0

Vacant Teacher Positions

0

0

0

Note: “Misassignments” refers to the number of positions filled by teachers who lack legal authorization to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc. * Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners.

Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (School Year 2017-18) Year and month in which data were collected: September 2017 Textbooks and instructional materials were selected from the most recent list of standards-based materials adopted by the State Board of Education (SBE) for grades K-8 and are consistent with the content and cycles of the curriculum frameworks adopted by the State Board of Education. Materials are available to 100% of our pupils. Zero percent (0%) of pupils in this district lack their own assigned textbooks and instructional materials.

Subject

Textbooks and Instructional Materials/ Year of Adoption

From Most Recent Adoption?

Percent of Students Lacking Own Assigned Copy

Reading/Language Arts

K-5 McGraw-Hill School Education, Reading Wonders, 2017 6-8 Holt, Language Arts, 2003

Yes

0

Mathematics

K-5 enVision MATH Common Core, 2015, Pearson Education, Inc. 6-8 McGraw-Hill, California Math Courses 1-3, 2015

Yes

0

Science

K-5 Houghton Mifflin, History Social Science, 2007 6-8 McDougal Littell, World History: Ancient Civilizations; Medieval & Early Modern Times; Creating America: Beginnings through World War, 2006

Yes

0

2016-17 School Accountability Report Card for E.O. GREEN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

Page 3 of 11

Textbooks and Instructional Materials/ Year of Adoption

Subject

From Most Recent Adoption?

Percent of Students Lacking Own Assigned Copy

History-Social Science

K-5 Houghton Mifflin, Science, 2007 6-8 McDougal Littell, Focus on Earth Science; Focus on Life Science; Focus on Physical Science; 2007

Yes

0

Foreign Language

7-8 Holt, Ven conmigo, 2003

Yes

0

Visual and Performing Arts

Pearson Scott Foresman, Scott Foresman Art, California Edition, 2004 Pearson Scott Foresman, Silver Burdett Making Music, California Edition, 2008

Yes

0

School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements (Most Recent Year) E.O. Green is one of two junior high schools in the Hueneme Elementary School District. Green promotes a safe, clean environment for students, staff, volunteers, and others. Our custodial team takes pride in maintaining clean and attractive facilities. The district administers a scheduled maintenance program to ensure that all classrooms are well maintained and to provide a pleasant learning environment. Together, school and district personnel work to ensure that the facility is clean, safe, and functional as determined by an interim evaluation instrument developed by the State of California Office of Public School Construction. Safety of students and staff is a primary concern. Adult supervision is provided in the classrooms and outside areas before and after school, and during nutrition, lunch and passing times. School administrators supervise entrance and exit points of the campus. To limit unauthorized access to our campus, gates are locked each morning when instruction begins, including the new security gate that directs all traffic during the school day through the school office. All visitors are required to sign in at the office and must wear a visitor identification badge. Teachers and classified staff are on duty daily to supervise after-school tutorials, enrichment classes, and athletic/recreational activities. School Facility Good Repair Status (Most Recent Year) Using the most recently collected FIT data (or equivalent), provide the following: • Determination of repair status for systems listed • Description of any needed maintenance to ensure good repair • The year and month in which the data were collected • The overall rating School Facility Good Repair Status (Most Recent Year) Year and month of the most recent FIT report: 08/21/2017 System Inspected

Repair Status Good

Systems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC, Sewer

X

Interior: Interior Surfaces

X

Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness, Pest/ Vermin Infestation

X

Electrical: Electrical

X

Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms, Sinks/ Fountains

X

Safety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials

X

Structural: Structural Damage, Roofs

X

Fair

2016-17 School Accountability Report Card for E.O. GREEN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

Poor

Repair Needed and Action Taken or Planned

Page 4 of 11

School Facility Good Repair Status (Most Recent Year) Year and month of the most recent FIT report: 08/21/2017 Repair Status

System Inspected

Good

External: Playground/School Grounds, Windows/ Doors/Gates/Fences

Fair

Repair Needed and Action Taken or Planned

Poor

X

Overall Facility Rating (Most Recent Year) Year and month of the most recent FIT report: 08/21/2017 Exemplary

Overall Rating

Good

Fair

Poor

X

B. Pupil Outcomes State Priority: Pupil Achievement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Pupil Achievement (Priority 4): • Statewide assessments (i.e., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress [CAASPP] System, which includes the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments for students in the general education population and the California Alternate Assessments [CAAs] for English language arts/literacy [ELA] and mathematics given in grades three through eight and grade eleven. Only eligible students may participate in the administration of the CAAs. CAAs items are aligned with alternate achievement standards, which are linked with the Common Core State Standards [CCSS] for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities); and • The percentage of students who have successfully completed courses that satisfy the requirements for entrance to the University of California and the California State University, or career technical education sequences or programs of study. CAASPP Test Results in English Language Arts/Literacy (ELA) and Mathematics for All Students Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven Percent of Students Meeting or Exceeding the State Standards (grades 3-8 and 11) Subject

School

District

State

2015-16

2016-17

2015-16

2016-17

2015-16

2016-17

English Language Arts/Literacy (grades 3-8 and 11)

31

29

30

28

48

48

Mathematics (grades 3-8 and 11)

18

17

19

20

36

37

Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.

CAASPP Test Results in ELA by Student Group Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2016-17) Total Enrollment

Number Tested

Percent Tested

Percent Met or Exceeded

"1,251"

"1,229"

98.24

28.8

Male

608

600

98.68

24.5

Female

643

629

97.82

32.91

Black or African American

20

19

95

36.84

American Indian or Alaska Native

--

--

--

--

Asian

12

12

100

41.67

Filipino

26

25

96.15

60

Student Group All Students

2016-17 School Accountability Report Card for E.O. GREEN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

Page 5 of 11

Total Enrollment

Number Tested

Percent Tested

Percent Met or Exceeded

"1,078"

"1,062"

98.52

25.14

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

--

--

--

--

White

83

80

96.39

55

Two or More Races

27

26

96.3

53.85

"1,070"

"1,053"

98.41

25.26

English Learners

667

651

97.6

17.51

Students with Disabilities

154

153

99.35

2.61

Students Receiving Migrant Education Services

11

10

90.91

10

Foster Youth

--

--

--

--

Student Group Hispanic or Latino

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged

Note: ELA test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The “Percent Met or Exceeded” is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard (i.e., achieved Level 3–Alternate) on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Note: Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores.

CAASPP Test Results in Mathematics by Student Group Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2016-17) Total Enrollment

Number Tested

Percent Tested

Percent Met or Exceeded

1,252

1,241

99.12

17

Male

609

605

99.34

16.69

Female

643

636

98.91

17.3

Black or African American

20

19

95

26.32

American Indian or Alaska Native

--

--

--

--

Asian

12

12

100

50

Filipino

26

26

100

26.92

1,079

1,072

99.35

14.83

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

--

--

--

--

White

83

81

97.59

28.4

Two or More Races

27

26

96.3

34.62

1,071

1,061

99.07

14.89

English Learners

667

663

99.4

9.95

Students with Disabilities

153

153

100

1.96

Students Receiving Migrant Education Services

11

11

100

0

Foster Youth

--

--

--

--

Student Group All Students

Hispanic or Latino

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged

2016-17 School Accountability Report Card for E.O. GREEN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

Page 6 of 11

Note: Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The “Percent Met or Exceeded” is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard (i.e., achieved Level 3–Alternate) on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Note: Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores.

CAASPP Test Results in Science for All Students Grades Five, Eight, and Ten Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced Subject

Science (grades 5, 8, and 10)

School

District

State

2014-15

2015-16

2014-15

2015-16

2014-15

2015-16

48

42

42

40

60

56

Note: Science test results include California Standards Tests (CSTs), California Modified Assessment (CMA), and California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) in grades five, eight, and ten. Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The 2016-17 data are not available. The California Department of Education is developing a new science assessment based on the Next Generation Science Standards for California Public Schools (CA NGSS). The new California Science Test (CAST) was piloted in spring 2017. The CST and CMA for Science will no longer be administered.

State Priority: Other Pupil Outcomes The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Other Pupil Outcomes (Priority 8): •

Pupil outcomes in the subject areas of physical education.

California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2016-17) Percent of Students Meeting Fitness Standards

Grade Level

Four of Six Standards

Five of Six Standards

Six of Six Standards

---7---

19.4

21.9

21.9

Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.

2016-17 School Accountability Report Card for E.O. GREEN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

Page 7 of 11

C. Engagement State Priority: Parental Involvement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Parental Involvement (Priority 3): •

Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each schoolsite.

Opportunities for Parental Involvement (School Year 2017-18) Strong partnerships with our parents are critical to the accomplishment of academic excellence at E.O. Green Junior High School. Opportunities for parent involvement include: • • • • •

Parent and military volunteers for playground games, Military Kids Club, sports, library, campus supervision and classrooms Active Parent-Teacher-Student Association (PTSA), "Coffee with The Principal/Cafe con la directora" monthly, ongoing Triple P Parenting Classes, Parent Academy classes, and Parent Education nights. School Site Council (SSC) and English Learners Advisory Committee (ELAC) Achieving Via Individual Determination (AVID) Program, various academic and service learning clubs (CJSF, ASB, Renaissance), and after-school sports teams that stress good sportsmanship and academic success At-Risk Tutoring Program, Drop-in Homework Clinic, ASES after-school program and other volunteer opportunities. such as Portfolio Fair

Please contact our counselor, Dr. Gomez, at 805-986-8750, if you are interested in parental involvement opportunities.

State Priority: School Climate The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: School Climate (Priority 6): • • •

Pupil suspension rates; Pupil expulsion rates; and Other local measures on the sense of safety.

Suspensions and Expulsions Rate

School

District

State

2014-15

2015-16

2016-17

2014-15

2015-16

2016-17

2014-15

2015-16

2016-17

Suspensions-------

6.1

4.0

9.3

2.0

1.6

3.4

3.8

3.7

3.6

Expulsions-------

0.2

0.0

0.2

0.1

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

School Safety Plan (School Year 2017-18) Date of Last Review/Update: November 21, 2017 Date Last Discussed with Staff: November 20, 2017 The Hueneme Board of Education has directed that schools be prepared for any actual or anticipated disaster. E.O. Green Junior High School has a Comprehensive School Site Safety Plan (available in the school office) which meets district and state requirements. This plan is monitored and reviewed annually by the School Safety Committee and is shared with faculty at least once per year. Emergency drills are conducted with students and staff regularly: fire and earthquake drills are done on a trimester basis, and lockdown drills are done twice yearly in cooperation with Oxnard Police Department. The safety plan includes disaster procedures, procedures for safe entry and exit of students, procedures for serious disciplinary problems, a sexual harassment policy, child abuse reporting procedures, school dress code, and school discipline policies. Safety procedures and elements of the Comprehensive School Safety Plan are reviewed by school staff at the start of each school year. Other methods of promoting school safety include campus supervision, many CPR-certified staff members, and a telephone and intercom communication system. Classrooms are equipped with first aid kits and fire extinguishers. We strive to maintain a safe and orderly school campus that supports a strong academic climate, and utilize the C.H.A.M.P.S. (Conversation/Help/Activity/Movement/Participation/Successful Students) positive behavior system and a five-step discipline plan, along with behavioral interventions to promote a safe campus. 2016-17 School Accountability Report Card for E.O. GREEN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

Page 8 of 11

Our safety plan was last reviewed and updated in November 2017. In our updated plan, we strengthened our procedures for safety and evacuation during emergencies. We also provided teachers and students with guidelines for maintaining proper hygiene to prevent the spread of viruses, and provide safety procedures and information on the use of C.H.A.M.P.S. Positive Behavioral Support.

D. Other SARC Information The information in this section is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorities for LCFF. Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2017-18) Indicator

School

District

In PI

In PI

2000-2001

2004-2005

Year 5

Year 3

Program Improvement Status First Year of Program Improvement Year in Program Improvement* Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement

N/A

10

Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement

N/A

100

Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data.

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary) 2014-15 Avg. Class Size

1-22

23-32

English---------------Mathematics

29

4

27

---------Science---------------Social Science

Subject

2015-16

Number of Classrooms 33+

Avg. Class Size

1-22

23-32

19

6

27

3

24

6

23

4

27

4

30

31

1

15

9

30

1

19

30

3

12

11

29

3

18

2016-17

Number of Classrooms 33+

Avg. Class Size

Number of Classrooms 1-22

23-32

33+

2

28

6

20

5

28

2

28

4

5

32

1

8

16

5

30

2

12

8

Note: Number of classes indicates how many classrooms fall into each size category (a range of total students per classroom). At the secondary school level, this ---------information is reported by subject area rather than grade level.

Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff (School Year 2016-17) Number of FTE Assigned to School

Average Number of Students per Academic Counselor

Academic Counselor-------

0

0

Counselor (Social/Behavioral or Career Development)

2

N/A

Library Media Teacher (Librarian)

0

N/A

Library Media Services Staff (Paraprofessional)

1

N/A

Psychologist-------

1

N/A

Social Worker-------

0

N/A

0.4

N/A

Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist

1

N/A

Resource Specialist-------

0

N/A

Other-------

1

N/A

Title

Nurse-------

Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data. *One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time.

2016-17 School Accountability Report Card for E.O. GREEN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

Page 9 of 11

Expenditures per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2015-16) Expenditures Per Pupil Total

Supplemental/ Restricted

Basic/ Unrestricted

Average Teacher Salary

$8,532

$1,706

$6,826

$86,960

District-------

N/A

N/A

$7,069

$87,355

Percent Difference: School Site and District

N/A

N/A

-3.4

-0.5

State-------

N/A

N/A

$6,574

$78,363

Percent Difference: School Site and State

N/A

N/A

3.8

11.0

Level School Site-------

Note: Cells with N/A values do not require data.

Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2016-17) In the 2016-17 school year, the Hueneme Elementary School District spent an average of $10,318 to educate each student, excluding food services: • • • • •

Title I: Funds are allocated to serve economically disadvantaged students. Title II: Provides funding for preparing, training and recruiting high quality teachers and principals. Title III: Provides funding for supplemental services for English Language Learners, their teachers and parents. Special Education: Provides funding to meet the unique needs of individuals with disabilities. After School Education & Safety (ASES): Funding is provided to implement recreation, academic, and enrichment programs after school.

Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2015-16) Category

District Amount

State Average for Districts In Same Category

Beginning Teacher Salary

$49,270

$48,678

Mid-Range Teacher Salary

$89,125

$78,254

Highest Teacher Salary

$106,291

$96,372

Average Principal Salary (Elementary)

$124,077

$122,364

Average Principal Salary (Middle)

$132,692

$125,958

Average Principal Salary (High) Superintendent Salary

$126,758 $193,748

$212,818

Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries

40%

38%

Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries

6%

5%

For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/.

2016-17 School Accountability Report Card for E.O. GREEN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

Page 10 of 11

Professional Development (Most Recent Three Years) Administrators, teachers and paraprofessionals participate in professional development focused on the New California State Standards in order to improve their skills in teaching and assessment of student learning. The primary focus areas are the instruction of gradelevel content standards, intervention strategies for students who have not mastered standards, Designated ELD, Integrated ELD, and assessment of student progress to drive instruction. Additional support has been provided by site experts in these areas as well as well. The primary area of focus for the most recent three-year period was: • English Language Arts • English Language Development • Writing • Mathematics • Piloted Materials • C.H.A.M.P.S. Program (Conversation, Help, Activity, Movement, Participation, Successful Students) Counselors have been trained in a myriad of topics, including Restorative Justice and Suicide Prevention Training, among others. Professional development is offered during the teaching day, on three student-free staff development days, during summer institutes, after school, and on weekends. Our school additionally has several early release days this year, to maximize training in ELD and other topics as needed. Substitute teachers are provided as needed, and/or stipends are offered for attendance. During the school year, teachers are supported by classroom observations, staff meetings, and grade-level and content area collaboration. Professional learning agendas are based on student achievement data and teacher input. In reading/language arts and mathematics, student performance data is ongoing and evaluated using a common district assessment at the end of each trimester. A Student Progress Report aligned to the New California State Standards is distributed to parents on a trimesterly basis, with progress report updates at mid-trimester.

2016-17 School Accountability Report Card for E.O. GREEN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

Page 11 of 11

Life Enjoy

" Life is not a problem to be solved but a reality to be experienced! "

Get in touch

Social

© Copyright 2013 - 2019 DOKUMENTIX.COM - All rights reserved.