What is Talent Anyway?

Apr 14, 2011 - the word as a catchphrase for those hard-to-find Python programmers, clinical scientists and mechanical engineers whom hiring managers ...

0 downloads 16 Views 84KB Size

Recommend Documents

What is Worship Anyway
thousand times ten thousand, and thousands of thousands, 12 saying with a loud voice: “Worthy is the Lamb who was slain to receive power and riches and ...

who is lottie anyway?
Dec 14, 2017 - Mother's Day, Father's Day, Tri-Rivers' Music Festival, ... Lottie Moon was a tiny woman, only 4'3”, with a gigantic impact on Southern Baptist ...

Whose Data is it Anyway?
Apr 3, 2008 - personal health information, Manatt Health Solutions recently authored a .... Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP's Board of Directors, is. Chairman of ...

Whose fault is it anyway?
It was taken for granted that there was someone to whom we could point a finger if someone or something was wrong. The disciples were simply portraying ...

Talent Is Overrated
Page 1 ... reading, brilliant book is simple: Talent is overrated. ... observation that no one seemed to reach the top ranks of chess players without a decade or so ...

Whose sample is it anyway? Widespread
Sep 30, 2016 - F1000Research 2016, 5:2103 Last updated: 20 MAR 2018 .... tion in R. Analysis of Stanley Foundation datasets: CEL files and sam-.

Jul 28, 2010 - plest yet most effective ways to achieve this is the talent .... potential that she is on the right development track and that her efforts are being ...

INTS 475 Human Trafficking and the International Community (3 credits with ... of human trafficking towards exploitation particularly of children, youth, men, and.

What Is ?
9:30 pm – Group Time. • 10:30 pm – In Dorm. • 10:45 pm – Lights Out. Tuesday, June 18th – Thursday, June 20th. • Attend the CIY Mix event and participate in ...

How big of deal is doctrine anyway?
Nov 27, 2016 - John Chrysostom. Bishop of Antioch, 386–397. Jn 7:16 Jesus answered them and said, “My doctrine is not. Mine, but His who sent Me.

What is Talent Anyway? The prevailing definition of talent, at least for the moment, seems to be that it denotes a rare skill. We use the word as a catchphrase for those hard-to-find Python programmers, clinical scientists and mechanical engineers whom hiring managers seem most to crave. Winning the War for Talent, therefore, is simply a matter of filling open positions with those who have such skills. The faster and cheaper that’s done, the greater our victory. Or is it? What happens when we fill an opening with a mediocre programmer, scientist or engineer? Or worse, a substandard one? Have we won the war or simply filled a req? If the goal of our recruiting is to position our employer or client to achieve its mission, then we have won a battle, but lost the War. We have, in effect, done only half our job. We may have completed an assignment, but we have not contributed as we must. We have acquired skills, but not the talent that is essential to an organization’s success. Talent, you see, is much more than even the hardest to find skill. Talent is the capacity for excellence. The good news is that every human being has it. As I explain in my book, The Career Activist Republic, it is a characteristic of our species. It is a gift with which we have all been endowed. The bad news is that many people don’t bring their talent to work with them. And, it’s that human shortcoming which creates the War for Talent. The shortage of excellence would be bad enough, but the hyper competition of today’s global marketplace exacerbates its impact. There are now “A” level Python programmers, clinical scientists and mechanical engineers working in China and India, Brazil and Germany. To survive and have even a chance to prosper, therefore, employers don’t need those with rare skills, they need those with the rare commitment to superior performance in every skill. How do you identify such talented candidates? Here are some telltale signs. They aren’t foolproof or all inclusive, but they will give you a sense of what to look for: Talented candidates move around. They shift continuously from assignment-to-assignment within their current employer or from one employer to another. They have what might best be described as a “three year itch.” Every three years or so, they feel compelled to find a new challenge to conquer in their field. Talented candidates are renaissance students. They see themselves as multidimensional contributors rather than as experts in a single function. For that reason, they devote themselves to

professional development not only in their primary field of work, but in ancillary areas that will enable them to express their talent in a wider range of work situations. Talented candidates seek advancement by testing rather than by pay grade. They are constantly striving to express and experience more of their talent, more of their capacity for excellence. When they interview, therefore, they are less interested in the opportunities for upward mobility and more interested in what new challenges they will get to face on-the-job. The only way to win the War for Talent is have a clear understanding of what victory we are trying to achieve. Our goal is not simply to fill openings with those who have rare skills. Our goal must be to ensure that our employer or client succeeds. And the only way to accomplish that objective is to recruit rare performers in as many skill categories as possible. For in the end, what matters most is not if we win the War for Talent, but if our organization does. Thanks for reading, Peter Visit me at Weddles.com Peter Weddle is the author of over two dozen employment-related books, including the recently released blockbuster The Career Activist Republic and Work Strong, Your Personal Career Fitness System, one of the most innovative career success books in print. Both are available at Amazon.com. © Copyright 2011 WEDDLE’s LLC. All Rights Reserved.


Life Enjoy

" Life is not a problem to be solved but a reality to be experienced! "

Get in touch


© Copyright 2013 - 2019 DOKUMENTIX.COM - All rights reserved.